Articles Posted in MDL

Court Rulings in Zantac Litigation Could Toss Many Cases: What This Means for You
Clay Hodges

After news broke that Zantac (the brand name for ranitidine) was linked to cancer, a large wave of lawsuits started making their way into state and federal courts. Many of these cases have been consolidated into the Zantac multi-district litigation, or MDL 2924. The Zantac MDL is still in the early stages of litigation, but…

Continue reading ›
Beware Big Business Spin: A Defense of “Ambulance Chasers”
Clay Hodges

Let me see if I have this straight: There is a huge medical device manufacturer that earns over $75 billion dollars each year. This corporation decides to market and sell a new medical device. The corporation refuses to do extensive testing on the device because that would take too long and cost too much money.…

Continue reading ›
C.R. Bard IVC Filter Trial: Injured Woman Wins $3.6 Million Jury Verdict
Clay Hodges

Victims of C.R. Bard’s IVC filters got some great news two weeks ago. An Arizona jury in the first bellwether trial awarded a woman $3.6 million for injuries she suffered after Bard’s “G2” IVC filter broke into pieces in her inferior vena cava vein, requiring open heart surgery to remove the broken pieces. The plaintiff,…

Continue reading ›
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Lawsuits: Some Claims Survive Preemption Defense
Clay Hodges

As we get older, our bodies weaken, bones become sore, and joints break down. Hip and knee problems are common conditions of aging. In fact, in the past decade millions of Americans have had hip replacement surgeries. Unfortunately, some defective artificial hips have caused patients more suffering than their original hip ailments. For one recent…

Continue reading ›
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip: Master Complaint Alleges “Lies”
Clay Hodges

As we saw in the previous post, the “Birmingham plaintiffs” submitted a 160-page Master Complaint in August 2017, alleging many Smith & Nephew misrepresentations that led to the introduction of an unreasonably dangerous product into the marketplace. In this post we continue our deep dive into the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Master Complaint. (Part…

Continue reading ›
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Master Complaint: Allegations of Rampant Misrepresentations
Clay Hodges

This is the story about the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Device, the patients harmed by the metal-on-metal artificial hip, the lawsuits that followed, and the massive Master Complaint filed last August against Smith & Nephew. But First, How Do We Get to a “Master Complaint”? This is how product liability multidistrict litigation begins:…

Continue reading ›
Testosterone Litigation: Axiron Settlement Reached; Androgel Jury Award Tossed
Clay Hodges

There have been two major developments in testosterone replacement therapy litigation in the past week. Last Thursday Eli Lilly & Co., the maker of the testosterone product Axiron, announced to Judge Matthew Kennelly in Illinois that an agreement had been reached to settle claims by people injured by Axiron testosterone. In the second development, the…

Continue reading ›
Invokana: A History of Profits, Ketoacidosis, Amputations, and Lawsuits
Clay Hodges

Invokana is a drug prescribed to treat people with Type 2 diabetes. The medication lowers blood sugar levels by preventing the kidneys from reabsorbing blood glucose. I’ve written often about Invokana and the studies that have identified problems with the drug, which you can read about here. I thought it may be useful to give…

Continue reading ›
Three DePuy Pinnacle Hip Trials Yield One Hundred Million Per Plaintiff
Clay Hodges

In the last three DePuy Pinnacle artificial hip bellwether trials, three juries awarded the following amounts of money: $502,000,000.00, $1,041,311,648.17, and $247,000,000.00. That’s a total of $1.79 billion dollars. The juries awarded plaintiffs compensatory damages (or actual damages) and punitive damages (to “punish” the defendant companies). Remember that these juries settled on these huge amounts…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Clay Hodges is a good lawyer and a good man. He always takes the time to help you understand exactly what is happening and what's to come. He shows genuine care for his clients. I would highly recommend him.

— Chris Wensil

The attorneys did an excellent job of articulating the legal language of the case. It was a learning process for me that required patience and trust. I can’t thank Spiggle Law & Clay Hodges enough. I’m grateful for other firms saying “no” to me in the process because many of them did not have the...

R.E.

Hi Clay, Just wanted to share that I stumbled across your podcast and it has been the most informative that I have come across. I’ve learnt more and enjoyed every minute and entertained people on the train to no end with the shock on my face. Keep up the good work and have a good one!

J.V.

Contact Us Now

Mallet

Free Consultation (919) 830-5602

Free Books